Forecast retrospective · 2020 → 2025

"Solar's Future is Insanely Cheap," five years on

In May 2020, Ramez Naam projected solar electricity costs to 2050 using a 30% learning rate and 16% annual industry growth, split across four location tiers. Half a decade of actual data is now in. The verdict: the big call — solar keeps getting cheap enough to undercut existing fossil plants — held. But the smooth curves didn't: hardware over-delivered, financing under-delivered, and the two roughly cancelled.

Global average LCOE, 2020→2024
−25%
5.7¢ → 4.3¢/kWh (IRENA) — nearly the slope Naam's curves implied (−20%)
Record auction price
1.04¢/kWh
Saudi Arabia, April 2021 — still unbroken through 2025
Deployment growth, actual vs assumed
~31% vs 16%
≈760 GW (2020) → ≈2.9 TW (2025): nearly 2 doublings, ~2× his growth input
Module spot price, 2020→2025
−55%
≈$0.20/W → ≈$0.09/W — the learning curve never stopped at the hardware level
Ramez Naam's 2020 chart 'Future Solar Costs by Year' showing four dashed curves for ultra low, low, medium and high cost locations declining from 2.5–8 cents per kWh in 2020 toward 0.4–1.2 cents by 2050, against a shaded band for operating costs of already-built fossil plants.
The prediction. Naam's May 2020 projection: unsubsidized solar cost by year of operation in four location tiers, assuming a 30% learning rate and 16% compound annual growth of the solar industry. Read off the curves, his implied 2025 values are ≈1.9¢ (ultra-low), ≈2.5¢ (low), ≈3.6¢ (medium) and ≈5.8¢/kWh (high-cost locations).

The scorecard, tier by tier

Dashed gray lines are Naam's projected curves (digitized from the chart above; extended to 2026). Colored series are actual prices — auction awards and tariffs for the cheap tiers, benchmark LCOEs and auction averages for the rest. All in US cents per kWh, nominal. Hover any point for details; the full data table is below.

Tier (Naam's examples)Naam's implied 2025Actual, 2024–25Verdict
Ultra-low cost — best Gulf / Chile auctions≈1.9¢1.3–1.6¢ (awards); record 1.04¢ in 2021Ahead on level — but flat since 2021, not still falling
Low cost — India, China≈2.5¢India tariffs 2.6–3.6¢; IRENA LCOE: China 3.3¢, India 3.8¢Behind ~0.5–1¢ — India's ₹2.00/kWh record (2020) still stands
Medium cost — California-type / global average≈3.6¢Global avg 4.3¢ (IRENA), BNEF benchmark 3.9¢; US unsubsidized ~5.8¢ (Lazard mid)Behind — global close in slope, US far off track
High cost — Northern Europe≈5.8¢Germany auctions 5.3–5.5¢; UK CfD ~8.3¢; Japan ~5.4–6.3¢Mixed — Germany on/ahead, UK and Japan behind; all flat-to-up since 2020

What actually happened

The trough came early, then the curve broke. The record lows Naam's ultra-low tier anticipated arrived almost immediately — Qatar at 1.57¢ and Abu Dhabi's Al Dhafra at 1.35¢ in 2020, then Saudi Arabia's 1.04¢/kWh in April 2021, a price his curve didn't reach until the mid-2030s. Then the streak stopped. Polysilicon rose roughly sixfold into 2022, freight quintupled, and interest rates repriced every power contract on Earth. Auction prices rose 40–60% in Saudi rounds, German tenders peaked at 7.0 €c/kWh in April 2023, Lazard's US range blew out, and Chile's auctions spiked on curtailment risk.

Hardware recovered; financing didn't. China's manufacturing buildout crushed module prices ~50% during 2023 to below $0.10/W — modules now sell at or below production cost — and IRENA's global installed cost fell to $691/kW in 2024, down 22% from 2020. Global average LCOE resumed falling: 4.4¢ in 2023, 4.3¢ in 2024. But BNEF's benchmark ticked up 6% in 2025 (to $39/MWh) on cost of capital, curtailment and price cannibalization, and no market has revisited its 2020–21 record lows.

The model's inputs erred in opposite directions. The measured learning rate through 2024–25 is ~26% (ITRPV) — below the 30% Naam called conservative. But deployment grew ~25–31%/year, roughly double his 16% input, delivering nearly two doublings by 2025 instead of one. Faster scaling largely offset the slower learning rate, which is why the global-average trajectory landed close to his curve even though both inputs were wrong.

The blind spot: solar's cost is no longer mostly hardware. Naam's model priced a technology; by 2025 the binding constraints are money and grids. Identical panels produce 1.3¢ power under Gulf sovereign financing and ~7¢ power in the US (IRENA puts 2024 US LCOE at 7.0¢ vs China's 3.3¢). Cost of capital, land, interconnection, tariffs and curtailment now set the price — which is why the cheap tiers sit near his curve while high-cost markets drift above it.

The headline claim aged well anyway. IRENA finds utility solar averaged 41% cheaper than the cheapest fossil alternative in 2024; BNEF benchmarks solar at $39/MWh against $102 for new combined-cycle gas. In sunny markets, new solar at 1.3–1.6¢/kWh is comfortably below the operating cost of existing coal and gas plants — the crossover his chart's shaded band promised. And with 2025's ~664 GW build (a third of it added in a single year), the volume story beat even his optimistic case.

Data table — every point plotted above
PanelSeriesYearUS ¢/kWhNote
Sources

Compiled July 2026. All prices nominal US cents per kWh; auction/PPA awards are as-bid levelized tariffs (Gulf IPPs benefit from sovereign-backed financing and free land; India figures converted at award-date exchange rates; UK CfD converted from 2024-money strike prices). Naam's curves digitized from the 2020 chart, so predicted values are approximate to ±0.1¢.